Etheree Poems as a Means of Integrating Literacy and Content Learning

In addition to nurturing students’ language and literacy development, poetry can be used as a tool for interdisciplinary learning. When students are invited to write poetry across the content areas, they build vocabulary and conceptual understanding (Bintz, 2016; Kane & Rule, 2004; Holtz, 1982).

In a recent article published in The Reading Teacher, Bintz (2016) argued specifically for the reading and writing of etheree poems across subjects in elementary school and beyond. Bintz (2016) described etheree poetry as “one of the most interesting, but relatively unknown forms” of poetry (p.605). 

Etheree poems generally consist of 10 lines, the first of which is comprised of a single syllable word. Line two is made up of two syllables. Line three consists of three of three syllables and so on and so on until the final ten-syllable line.

Within the article Bintz provides many examples of discipline-specific etheree poems. The below poem, represents a single example of a mathematics poem composed by a third grade teacher and referenced by Bintz (see the actual article for the original form in which each line also visually represented the geometric shape(s) depicted).  

“Square
Circle
Triangle
Rhombus, ellipse…
What will be up next?
Could it be an arc, line
Angel, parallelogram,
Cone, rectangle? What, a pattern?
See it? What’s next? What is the reason?
Let your brain think of the next shape “season”.” (p.606).

What do you think? Are etheree poems a practical way of integrating literacy and content in your classroom? Had you heard of them before? We would love to hear your thoughts and experiences specific to etheree and other forms of poetry. 


Bintz, W. P. (2016). Writing etheree poems across the curriculum. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 605-609.
Holtz, J. (1982). Get your children buzzing about school. Science and Children, 20(2), 6-8.
Kane, S. & Rule, A.C. (2004). Poetry connections can enhance content area learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult        Literacy, 47(8), 658-669.

Comments